Notes:

As a Lt. Col., Samuell Forte was a representative to the House of Assembly for St. Johns Parish from the years 1712,1715-1719, 1721 and 1723-27. He was elected in the place of John Rouse Aug. 19, 1712. (F-193, F-748) As well as Lieutenant Colonel he had also been Justice of the Peace of the St. John's Regiment of the Militia.

He was married twice. He and his wife Ann Forte are listed with their children in the 1715 Census Records of St. John's Parish, in Barbados. (F-159) They had two more children, Enoch and Tomazine after this census. The following Barbados Deeds give detail about Samuel Forte Jr., his eldest daughter Elizabeth and his father Samuel Forte, Sr. and mother-in-law, Elizabeth Forte. V. 30, p. 138: Samuel Forte (Sr.) of St. Johns deeds to granddaughter Elizabeth Forte, Daughter of Samuel Forte Jr. of St. Johns Parish, with love and affection, 1 negro woman, Catriante, and 1 negro boy, Johnny. V. 30, pg. 139-140: 28 December 1714, Elizabeth Forte, Sr. gave Elizabeth Forte Jr. 1 negro girl, Martillah and 15 pounds sterling. V. 30, p. 139 a deed made 15 July 1717 between Col. Samuel Forte of St. Johns and Mrs. Elizabeth Forte of same gave Elizabeth 20 pounds sterling and 1 negro girl named Bella. V. 30, p. 138: 6 July 1720, Samuel Forte, Son of the within named Sam. Forte and father of Elizabeth Forte gave d. Elizabeth 1 woman slave, Catherine, Johnny and 1 girl, Jonny. V. 30, p. 140: 13 Aug. 1720, Ralph Weekes, guardian of Enoch Gritton (Under age 21) (because of marriage of Enoch G. & Elizabeth, eldest daughter of Samuel Forte), was pd. 1500 pounds in the parish of St. Phillips. V. 30, p. 179: 9 Sept. 1720, Samuel Forte of St. Johns deeded to Ralph Weekes of St. Phillips 10 acres in St. George bordering land of Col. William Lesly, Benjamin Battign, Richard Sutton DeSouth Carolina. for 200 pounds of Goods paid by Ralph Weeks. V. 30, p. 149: 14 Sept. 1720, Samuel Forte, St. Johns, deeded to William Lesly, St. Johns, 10 acres in St. George bound by Benjamin Batlyn, Mrs. Elis. Burks and said Forte. (F-254)

His sons are in or conspicuously not in the following records: Son Samuel--Left a will probated in 1745. He did not mention a wife or children. He did mention his brother Christopher's children: Samuel, William, Christopher, and Elizabeth and his brother Richard, brother Rich, brother-in-law, Samuel Leslie and nephew James Eastmand. (This means that two of his sisters were married to a Samuel Leslie and an Eastmand.) (F-194c) Son Richard-- No will has been located for him. No sign of children or a wife are in the church records for Barbados. Son Christopher--No will has been located for him. His children are mentioned in his brother Samuel Forte's will as Samuel, (William), Christopher and (Elizabeth). His children and wife are not mentioned in Barbados church records. Son Thomas--No information has been located about this son and his possible offspring. Son Enoch-- Was a Doctor in St. Philips Parish, Barbados. He did not declare any sons in his will. Children were Jane, Elizabeth, Mary Austin, and Rebecca all under age 21, when he died in 1771/2.

Samuel married Ann ESTWICKE before 1703. Ann (daughter of Richard ESTWICK and Joan WALKER) was born before 8 Apr 1680 in St. Johns Parish, , Barbados; died in 1720. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

Notes:

Her birthdate is listed as 1681 in some 2nd hand sources, but she was named in her father's will dated Apr 8, 1680 so the latest she could have been born was 1680.

Notes:

According to cousin James Forte, the Forte's came from Normandy, France originally. There are two Forte brothers that assisted William the Conqueror and were given titles and land in England for their services. The Forte family had settled in Somersetshire, England during the 16th and 17th centuries. Samuel Forte came to Barbados in 1680 from the Somersetshire family according to Burkes Landed Gentry. However, he is likely the Samuel Forte who was a witness to George Foster's will on Nov. 23, 1670, in St. John's Parish, Barbados. Another of the witnesses was Edmund Haynes. Samuel later owned land that became known as Haynes Hill Plantation in St. John's Parish.

He was supposedly exiled from England, obviously with some portable wealth in tack. James Forte, a cousin, states that the Fortes lost their property, title, and the "scue" on the end of their name when siding with the Royalists against Cromwell. The name was originally Fortibus according to the "General Armory". It states the Forte's from Somerset were originally from the name de Fortibus.

The coat of arms for the Fortes in Somerset also comes from Fortibus. This could have occurred when Samuel was a child as Cromwell came into power about 1651. It would have been his unproven father who lost his title and lands. Thus when Samuel was in his 20's to 30's he would have immigrated to Barbados to make his way in the world. (F-469)

Samuel came to own what was later owned by a Mr. Haynes and named Haynes Hill Plantation in Barbados. He and Thomas Estwick are listed as beneficiaries of Mary Combs Adamson's will in 1689 in St. John's Parish. He is in a position in the transcription where it is difficult to tell if he is a friend of the family or a brother-in-law. He was a friend and executor for John Pearnell's will dated 1691 on an island called Hothersall's Poole.

He is named as a friend of Augustin Dry's will dated May 1692 in St. John's Parish. The will names his 2 oldest daughters of Samuel Forte Senior. Thomasin was named in the will and was only 12 at the time. Augustin's will transcription then names the following persons as executors: Frances (age 20 if it's Samuel's daughter), Ursula (wife of Samuel Forte Sr.), Mrs. Ula Forte (likely wife of Codrington), a Mary Franck, and Codrington Forte as executors. Here are possible theories about the relationships in this will.

As far as we know, all Forte's in Barbados descend from this Dr. Samuel Forte, Esquire, making it likely that Codrington is his son named after the very wealthy Codrington family of Barbados who were Sugar Barons.

If Mrs. Ula is the wife of Codrington, she might be the daughter of Arlington. Since Samuel is about 43 at the time and Arlington is about 40 this would suggest that Ula was a young married woman. Codrington could be Augustin's son-in-law. That would mean that his friend Samuel Forte's 20-year-old daughter and wife was named Executor along with Codrington and his wife. They would have been family to Codrington. The name Codrington is the same as the Honorable Christopher Codrington that Samuel names in his will as having given his third wife, Elizabeth Estwick, a silver plate since they (Samuel and she) had been married. Perhaps that is how they met as Samuel appears to have given a son the name Codrington after someone he admired previous to his marriage to Elizabeth Estwick.

Augustin's young married daughter might have requested to have her mother-in-law and sister-in-law's help along with her husband. Samuel's daughter Thomasin who was only about 12 at the time was also named in Augustin's will. He certainly was close to Samuel as a friend. I can't find a family relationship through Samuel's first wife who was Mary Culpepper explaining why his daughters were named in the will. The most likely scenario is that the Fortes were Augustin's daughters-in-laws and friends of the family to Augustin. That would suggest that Codrington was a son of Samuel who died before Samuel wrote his will.

He is named in his son-in-law, William Collymer's will in 1705. In Samuel's own will dated Oct. 16, 1711, in St. John's Parish, he bequeaths his wife the silverplate that she had been given by the Honorable Christopher Codrington after he had married Elizabeth Estwick. He give money to his grandchildren due him from the estate of William Collymore. (F-164) He and the members of his family were buried in a tomb on his plantation. (F-24) Note the name Codrington appearing as a Codrington Forte in this family. It was Christopher Codrington III who lived till 1610 that Samuel is likely referring to in his will. A Sarah Codrington in her will names her kinswoman, Jane.

In his will, he stipulated that the tomb should always be available for whoever wished to visit. When my past husband and I visited Barbados in Apr. of 1990, we were able to visit Haynes Hill House and see the tomb - plaque and all. The current owner of the House, Jean Porter, stated that the small plot of land surrounding the tomb does not belong to anyone. It was bought by an English descendant in the 1900's and left as a preserved space which he had planned to grow hedgerows to honor his ancestors. That never occurred.

The house that is now standing on Haynes Hill is not the house that Samuel originally lived in. It was blown down in the 1831 hurricane and the one that now stands was built then. This house is, according to Jean Porter, haunted. The ghost walks around at night in what sounds like heavy men's work boots and is harmless.

The Coat of Arms for the Forte family is a shield with a Rooster and 3 red mallets as symbols. The motto is Forte Scutum Salas Ducum. Forte means strong. Scutum in ancient Rome was a leather shield, Salus means health, and Ducum means of or relating to Dukedom. (F-465)

Although the parentage of this Samuel Forte is unknown, I have two working theories as to his parentage based on baptismal, marriage, and burial records for all towns in Somersetshire having records in the 1600s. The information was supplied by James Forte of Ontario and was researched professionally in 1977-78. Upon sorting it, it is possible Samuel's parents were Thomas and Thomasine Forte of South Petherton or Samuel of St. Mary Magdalen Parish in Taunton, Somerset, England.

The first theory that he is the son of Thomas and Thomasine is based on the following pattern. They had a daughter, Thomasine in April of 1663. Baptismal records from that town were missing for seven years from 1653 to 1660, the likely time period of birth for our Samuel Forte. Thomasine, his possible mother, is the name that clued me in. Samuel has a daughter named Thomasin, which is rather unusual. Secondly, his son Samuel only has one male and female name unaccounted for from his wife's or his side, and that is Thomas and Thomasin. I believe it is likely that he named them after his parents. This theory needs further verification in lawsuit or deed records.

The second theory is that he is the son of Samuel Forte of St. Mary Magdelen in Taunton, Somerset, England. Only one child, Thomas, has been recorded as the son of this Samuel. Thomas was christened on Nov. 18, 1650. Thomas's spelling of his surname is interpreted as Forde by freereg.org.uk. This Samuel still could be the father of our Samuel as he has the correct name and right age. He is also the only Samuel that has been found in the records of Somerset Co., England. Possible children of this Samuel Sr. whose fathers are unreadable by FreeReg translators were George, Joan, Hannah, John, and Elizabeth, none of which are names carried down by Samuel. The records again are not conclusive, as the microfilm is nearly unreadable. The original records from St. Mary Magdelen were still privately held when a professional researcher last tried to check them.

There are two other mysteries about this Forte family. When we were in Barbados and saw Haynes House in the early 1990's, we also got to view the family crypt. The plaque on the exterior indicated that it contained the remains of Samuel and Ursula Forte and family. This plaque according to a manuscript by Ralph Greenidge who was raised at Haynes House in the early 1900's was not the original. The plaque had been replaced twice since the original carvings on the coral walls of the crypt. When he was there, it stated that it also contained the remains of Mary Culpepper (who would have been the mother of the 3 daughters of the original Samuel Forte.) This was verified by a family friend whose friend stole the nameplate off of Mary Culpepper's coffin sometime in the 1900's. Therefore, Samuel had 3 wives in his life that we know about. It is entirely possible that Mary Culpepper died in childbirth in 1685 at which point Samuel married Ursula. In that case, Samuel would also be the son of Mary Culpepper. That actually sounds probable to me and is my current theory.

Lastly, there is a Samuel Forte, Mariner, from Wapping, Middlesex, England who wrote a will when he was outward bound to sea on February 25, 1675/1676. The will proved on July 29, 1680, gives his estate to his friend Andrew Davison of Wapping. Because the date of probate is the same year as my children's ancestor Samuel entering Barbados, a connection to this Samuel needs to be studied. Instead of a will, was this possibly a settlement of his estate in England when he decided to move to Barbados for good?

Dr. married Mary CULPEPPER, * about 1671 in Of Somerset, England. Mary (daughter of Francis CULPEPPER, *) was born before 1658 in Of Somerset, England; died in 1685 in St Johns Parish, Barbados. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

Notes:

There are two male Culpepper's in Barbados records that I have found so far that could easily be relatives of Mary. This info is according to the "Omitted Chapters from Hotten's Original Lists of Persons of Quality." The first part described below was a census taken in 1680. Mr. Francis Culpeppar who owned 74 acres, 2 servants and 22 slaves. Mr. Allen Culpepper who owned 150 acres, 3 servants and 30 slaves. By a measure of wealth, though its always sad to think about anyone with slaves, Mr. Allen Culpepper is probably the elder sibling of Francis.

Francis by name, would account for Samuel and Mary's first daughter being named Francis if he was the father of Mary. Culpeppers/Colepepers in England were primarily in Kent, Middlesex, Sussex and Worcestshire Counties.

Notes:

In 1671, Richard witnessed a will for William Allen of St. John's Parish. William's wife was Joan Allen. Richard is also listed as having custody of land purchased from Gilbert Meason in St. John's Parish by William Allen??This Richard was in the 1679 Barbados Census as an owner of 40 acres and 20 slaves in St. George Parish. (F-161) He is listed of London, and a merchant in Barbados from Nigel Forte's research in Barbados. (F-604) He also could be referred to in any of the following references that were in the Barbados census of 1679/80. A Mr. Richard Estwick brought 10 men to serve under the Honorable Coll. Thomas Colleton on March 9, 1679/80. A Patrick Hicky was a soldier with armes who came in place of Mr. Estwick. A Mr. Richard Estwicke with 3 horses, a Mr. Henry Eastwicke with 1 horse, and a Mr. Richard Eastwicke, jr. with one horse served under Capt. John Leslie. Mr. Richard Estwicke, Senior owned 6 bought servants, 118 Negroes, and 330 acres in St. John's Parish. Mr. Richard Estwicke, Jr. owned 10 acres and Mr. Henry Estwicke owned 10 acres in the same parish. These are the only Estwicks listed in the Barbados census of 1679. (F-397) Richard's will is as follows: Richard Estwick Gent. St. Johns Parish, 8 Apr 1680, RB6/14, p. 217, Sons Richard Estwick and Christopher Estwick both at 21; daugh Elizabeth Estwick; dau Ann Estwick, wf's mo Elizabeth Walker, wf Joane Estwick - Xtrx; friends Maj. Richard Peacock & capt. Nat;h: Travayon (trevanion) - Trustees. Signed Richard Estwick, Wit; William Blanchard (Blanhard), Francis Thurban, James scott, Proved 14 Apr 1681.

Richard married Joan WALKER in 26 Nov. Joan (daughter of Unknown WALKER and Elizabeth UNKNOWN) was born in 1640 in London, England; died after 1680 in Of St. John's Parish, Barbados. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

Notes:

This might be the Thomas Forte who married an Elizabeth and had Elizabeth in 1651 and Alice in 1653. However, because he would have only been about 17 at the time, I suspect that he was the Thomas who married Thomasine in 1663 instead. (F-472)

Also note, that we might not know the parents of this Thomas at all. It is possible, but improbable that there was a third Thomas in South Petherton, who did not have a baptismal record. How I have this Thomas connected is theory based on probability at this point. He might be the Thomas who left a will in 1721 in South Petherton, though this is late enough to likely be a generation more recent than the parish records I have copies of.

Thomas married Thomasina about 1653. Thomasina died about Feb 1685 in South Petherton, Somerset, England. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

Notes:

It is theory that Mr. Francis Culpepper of St. Phillip's Parish, Barbados was the father of Mary. If so, Mary and Samuel's first daughter was named after him.

Notes:

His will is available in the Canterbury Wills on Ancestry. It is very difficult reading.

He first mentions 3 Estwicks (Marie, Richard and Brooke) as his younger children who appear not yet to be of age. He gives them to the care of his brother Francis and it looks like monetary support to do that. He bequeaths items and care to his wife (Eleanor), his son Francis, his son Isaac, his son Isaace, Christopher, Adrian, daughter Ellinor... and I'm assuming the rest. He names his son-in-law, Robert Wells and his grandchild (via Robert without listing the child's sex or name). This means that Christopher and Eleanor had another unknown daughter who probably died previous to 1657. He names his wife Eleanor as his administrator.

Christopher was "late of London" in a 1648 record. His father Christopher's will in the Prerogative Court of Canterbury, suggests that he could have been born anywhere in the Northhamptonshire area as that is the region where the persons he names in his will are from. His father Christopher, lived in Stoke, Coventry, Warwickshire, England when he wrote his will and owned lands in Bedford and Kent which he also bequeathed. These lands covered quite a distance in the southern half of England.

The entry in Caribbeana is as follows:
Christopher Estwicke of St.John's Parish Barbados. Will dated 17th January 1660/1. My wife Anne Estwicke. My children [''three visible''] Ellinor, Mary and Christopher, and a 4th not yet born. My brother Francis. To my uncle Richard E. my gold ring, formerly my father's, with our coat of arms on it. Proved 28 January 1660/1. Entered16 April 1662.

In the tree appearing in Caribbeana it is stated that he "Purchased 50 acres in Barbados in 1641/2. It is assumed that this was Lightfoots in St.John's Parish, Barbados. We can also assume that Estwick died between 17 and 28 January 1660.

Christopher married Eleanor WALDEN between 1627 and 1670. Eleanor (daughter of Isaac WALDEN, daughter of Isaac WALDEN) was born in 1610-1633 in Coventry, Warwickshire, , England; died between 1655 and 1721 in Stoke, Warwickshire, England. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

Unknown married Elizabeth UNKNOWN. Elizabeth died after 1680 in Of St. John's Parish, Barbados. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]