Matches 4,051 to 4,100 of 7,196
| # | Notes | Linked to |
|---|---|---|
| 4051 | This Mary could be married to either Samuel Hoover in 1828 in Miami Co., OH or to Joseph F. Jay in 1839. (C-1025) | COATE, Mary (I13729)
|
| 4052 | This Mary is often stated to be the Mary who is the d. of William Jay and Elizabeth Natherson. I've seen dates where their daughter, Mary is born on Jan. 4, 1777 or Jan. 4, 1767. If the later is correct, then it's still possible that shhe one married to William Coate. William and Elizabeth Natherson Jay do have a daughter named Mary as she is in her father's will. (C-949, 1698) Mary is alive in 1807 when she witnessed the sale of her husband's land to James Brooks in Newberry District, South Carolina. She was also received on certificate from the Bush River Monthly Meeting by the Miami M.M. in 1808. She isn't in the 1820 census with her husband, but she is supposedly in deed records in 1820 and 1822 when they sell off their land in Miami Co., Ohio. This does need checked for her signature, since the 1822 date occurred in July and she supposedly died in Mar of 1822. | JAY, Mary "Polly" (Not in father's will) (I13742)
|
| 4053 | This Mary is the ancestor of Mary Pearson Greenlee who had the records of Marmaduke's 4 extra children. It can be proved that she is the daughter of this Big John Coate because in her Quaker marriage record, she is listed as the daughtern Coate, Blacksmith, of the 96th District. When he witnesses the marriage his name is right next to Rachel Coate (his wife). Their Quaker marriage record follows: Whereas Samuel Pearson, Son of Samuel Pearson, of the District of 96, and the County of Newberry, farmer, and Mary Coate, daughter of John Coate, blacksmith, district and county aforesaid. Having declared their intentions of taking each other in marriage before several meetings of the people called Quakers, in the county of Newberry, aforesaid, and the proceedings of the meetings. Samuel Pearson, esq. and Mary Coate after due inquiry and deliberate consideration thereof were followed by the Friends Meeting, they appeared clear of all others, and having the consent of their parents, relatives concerned, now these are to certify to all whom it may concern that for accomplishing of such marriage, this second day of the ninth month, called September, in the year 1790. They, Samuel Pearson and Mary Coate appeared in a public assembly of the people, and others in their meeting. Now declares as followeth before the assembly. 'I take this my friend, Mary Coate to be my wife, promising through divine assistance to be unto her a loving and faithful husband, until it shall please the Lord by death to separate us,' And the Mary Coate then and there in the assembly in like manner declares as follows, 'Before God and this assembly I take this my friend Samuel Pearson to be my husband promising through divine assistance to be unto him a loving and faithful wife until it please the Lord to separate us.' And the Samuel Pearson and Mary Coate as a further confirmation thereof and in testimony thereunto did then and there and before those present set their hand." The certificate continues with the names of those who witnessed the ceremony. "We whose names are hereunto subscribed being present among others at the solemnizing of the marriage and the subscription in the manner aforesaid, and the year above written: James Brooks (uncle on mom's side), Isaac Hollingsworth (uncle on mom's side) Abraham Hollingsworth (future brother-in-law), John O'Neall, Simbra Grant, Rachel Hollingsworth, Rachel McCoole, Mary Cook, Susannah Brooks, Susannah Coate, Mary O'Neall, Jehu Beel, Lydia Hasket, Hugh 0'Neall, Joseph Furnas, Esther Pearson, Charity Cook (sister), Rachel Coate (sister), Ann Galbreath, and Samuel, Mary (2), William, Benjamin, Margaret, and Sarah Pearson, John Coate (father), Rachel Coate (mother), Isaac Cook (brother-in-law)." "Quote from Enid M. Hawthorne book, The Pearson Family Tree from England to America" (C-729, 1536, 1538, 1540) Not only are most of these witnesses relatives of the bride or groom, but Mary and Samuel named their first son Wright after her family surname, the second son Enoch after a great grandfather, and another son, Sampson after Mary's youngest brother, all of this as kindly provided by John H. Coats of Michigan. (C-1547) Mary is some second hand sources, is listed with a second husband, Thomas Furnas, right before her marriage to Samuel Pearson. However, this information is incorrect. It is her sister Rachel that marries Thomas Furnas in 1792. (C-2111) | COATE, Mary (I13351)
|
| 4054 | This Mary might be the one that married Newman Paine on Aug. 23, 1774 in PA or that married Robert Cumming on Sep 7, 1774. (C-1677) | COATE, Mary (I1266)
|
| 4055 | This Mary might be the one that married Paine Newman on Aug 23, 1774 in Pennsylvania. (C-1677) By 4 autosomal triangulations, we now know for certain that she is the mother of Mathias Coats. She later did marry a Mr. Swann. | COATE, Mary (I7706)
|
| 4056 | This might apply to this James in Chalkley transcriptions. 1801--February 17, James Young and John Dickey, surety. James Young and Jane Dickey, daughter of said John. The following applies to this James from Chalkley.Hugh Kennedy ands Young, surety, in bond on marriage of said Hugh Kennedy and Elizabeth Young, daughter of Robert Young, dec., of Augusta Co., dated 11 Nov. 1802, consent by James Young for sister Elizabeth, past 21 years to marry Hugh Kennedy of Rockbridge Co., VA. | YOUNG, James (I7637)
|
| 4057 | This might be a typo in Hinshaw, but he lists James, Hannah and daughter Mariba moving on certificate to Mill Creek MM on 1/5/1814. Their duaghter, Martha had married in 1813. | COPPOCK, Mariba (I752)
|
| 4058 | This might be her marriage record from freereg.org.uk. Anne JOHNSONE Machelle SPONLEY Marriage 16 Apr 1618 London (City) Queenhithe : St Peter Paul Wharf : Other Transcript | JOHNSON, Anne (I4980)
|
| 4059 | This might be the Amy who married James Paxon on Oct 26, 1780 in Quakertown MM, Pennsylvania (C-1679) | COATE, Amy (I1062)
|
| 4060 | This might be the James who was in the 1830 and 1840 census for Warren Co., Ohio and in the 1880 for Xenia City, Ward 5, Green County, Ohio. (C-383, 1025) | HOLLINGSWORTH, James (I136)
|
| 4061 | This might be the John Millard who was formerly of the Indian Navy. (F-458) He would be of a correct age to be the son of John Millard and Arabella Chavasse of Burford, Oxfordshire, ENG. They likely had a daughter named Arabella Chavassrd who married Nathaniel Forte, son of Nathaniel Weekes Forte. (C-2073) | MILLARD, John (I1489)
|
| 4062 | This might be the John who lived in Salem Co., NJ in 1737 and in Cumberland Co., NJ in 1750-60 when it was established. He is not in Quaker Records. He apparently moved to Pennsylvania before 1766 as he was in the tax records for W. Notm Twp., Chester Co., PA in 1766, 1767, and 1768. (C-172) In 1728, Cassius Milton Jay had theorized that the John who lived in NJ and Pennsylvania from 1737-1768 was the father of this Jonathon, William and Joseph instead and the son of John Jay b. 1652. However, he had dropped that theory from his later publications. | JAY, Jonathon (I638)
|
| 4063 | This might be the same Thomas Jay who arrived in Maryland in 1674 whom is referenced in "The Early Settlers of Maryland" by Skordas. (C-826) | JOY, Thomas (I348)
|
| 4064 | This might be the Thomas Coates that administered the probate of Henry Ridgeway's estate in Burlington Co., NJ on Apr 18, 1791. (C-1078) | COATES, Thomas (I1068)
|
| 4065 | This might be the Thomas Forte who married an Elizabeth and had Elizabeth in 1651 and Alice in 1653. However, because he would have only been about 17 at the time, I suspect that he was the Thomas who married Thomasine in 1663 instead. (F-472) Also note, that we might not know the parents of this Thomas at all. It is possible, but improbable that there was a third Thomas in South Petherton, who did not have a baptismal record. How I have this Thomas connected is theory based on p robability at this point. He might be the Thomas who left a will in 1721 in South Petherton, though this is late enough to likely be a generation more recent than the parish records I have copies of. | FORTE, Thomas (I13654)
|
| 4066 | This might be the will for this John Hall. If so though, he either married twice or I have the death date incorrect for his wife, Elizabeth Cornwall.http://dunhamwilcox.net/wills/hall_john1712.htm"Digest of the Early Connecticut Probates(Hartford District),Charles W. Manwaring,Hartford, 1902,Vol 2, p. 215Capt. John HALL, Middletown. Invt. | HALL, Capt. John (I15495)
|
| 4067 | This might be the William Underwood who witnessed the marriage of James Wickersham and Sarah Garretson on 18th d of the 3rd mo 1773 in Warrington M.M., Warrington Twp., York Co. Pennsylvania He was in the friends column. (C-2418) He islliam Underwood Jr. who attends the marriage of Abel Walker and Ann Vale on the 13th day of the 5m 1773 in Warrington Twp., York Co., PA along with his father. | UNDERWOOD, William (I732)
|
| 4068 | This might possibly be the John Coppock who had a bastard son named John who was born, christened and died on the same day in July of 1593. | COPPOCK, John (I1546)
|
| 4069 | This Moses William Coppock is listed with this information in a published book whose reference I can't find currently and multiple descendants have had his name, his wife and his children passed down to them with their family history. Roboppock Keller got this information from her grandmother's written notes on the family. Her grandfather was the President of the Indianapolis organization of the Coate Coppock Heirs. According to them this Moses William, wife Martha, sons Benjamin and James are the Coppocks who originally helped purchase the land from the Cherokee Indians and then lease it out for $1.00 an acre in 1816. It is not known for sure if this Moses William and his wife Martha were living in 1816, though they'd be in their late 70's and early 80's at this point in time. It is also not known whether or not the Coppock Coppock land lease was real or fraudulent as is oft stated. Moses William's parentage is uncertain. It is thought by some that he is the son of Moses and Martha Coppock born early in the 1800s. However, Moses did not marry Martha Lester until 1740 and this younger Moses was born in 1736. Roberta Keller theorizes that he is the son of Moses' brother Bartholomew, making him a cousin to Mary Jane Coppock, wife of Marmaduke Coate, also involved in the land lease. (C-2144) According to a descendant of this Moses William Coppock born in 1855, this Moses W. and Martha also had a son named Samuel Coppock married to Lavina Coate that is sometimes found connected to Joseph and Jane Coate. | COPPOCK, Moses William (I10012)
|
| 4070 | This name is also spelled Rea, Rhea and Ree. It was pronounced Ray. It might come from the Scotts names of McRay, McRea, McCrea, McCree or Machree. Nicholas was a British tenant on Lord Viscount Grandison's Plantation in Armagh, IRL.e are two Nicholas Wray's listed in 1630/31 as working the lands of Lord Grandison, both owning a Snaphance, a firelock handgun. The second Nicholas might be an error of duplication or two generations of Nicholas. The error is suspected because these Englishmen working the land were in the army and usually rather young of age. In the 1641 Irish rebellion, the St. Johns who oversaw the plantation were killed, their church and castle taken and Tanderagee destroyed. Nicholas might have died in the1641 Irish Rebellion. His only known child was Ann Ree. (C-956) | WRAY, Nicholass (I15540)
|
| 4071 | This Nicolas is rarely listed as the son of Benjamin. He is not in Benjamin's will, nor are any of his children listed in Benjamin's will like the rest of his grandchildren. Therefore, if he is the son of Benjamin, he probably died earlys marriage and left no children. (F-31) | WILMOT, Nicholas (I12442)
|
| 4072 | This occurred in Kent Co., Maryland between 1701 and 1702 according to the Maryland Archives and the fact that John Sr. is still alive. It involves his sons, John and Richard also. Peter Mersey and Thomas Mounsier in their prper prsons and Phillip Duff by John Ponder his Surety, Are bound to Appear As Evidences here next Court In the Sume of ten pds Sterg ~ John Ponder Junr. and Richard Ponder are bound in twenty pounds Sterg. And John Ponder Senr. and Tho: Ford are bound in ten pounds Sterg Each to be levy'd as is abovesd. in Case the Sd. Jno. Ponder Junr. and Richd. Ponder do not Make their Appearance at the next Court He resided in Sussex, Delaware in 1717. The Commissioners of Sussex signed a land warrant to John Ponder on 13 Nov 1717 for 200 acres in the Forest of Sussex. He was listed as "of Cedar Creek Hundred" in the membership role of St. Matthews Church in 1717. He died in 1719 in Sussex County, Delaware. His will names eldest daughter Mary; eldest son, John "plantation where I now live and land in Maryland including Shepherd's Field"; sons James and Daniel, daughters Sarah, Margaret and Rosanna. He gave his plantation in Queen Ann's County, Maryland to his wife, Mary. The will was probated on 15 Apr 1719. Liber A, folios 107-109. There is a debate about whether or not John is the son of John Ponder and a wife Margaret supposedly mentioned as his wife in a 1680 deed where he cancels his headrights. We have not been able to find the document supporting this. This John also was the husband of Mary, d. of Ann Norris. Some believe Mary was the mother of all but one of his children. DNA seems to be supporting this 2nd theory. I checked my mother's DNA who was born in 1916 against 17 of Ann Norris' father, Thomas Edward Norris' descendants. About 1/4 of them had chromosome segments in common with my mother from 3.2 to 6.7 cM's. For this far back in time that is amazing. | PONDER, John (I10231)
|
| 4073 | This or James' son could be the Patrick who had 149 acres being surveyed where he lived on Reed Creek in 1748 in Augusta Co., VA. He is likely the Patrick who witnessed the deed of Robert and Mary Ewing in Lunegan Co., Virginia in 175ey were selling land that they'd previously purchased in Roanoke Co., Virginia. | CALHOUN, Patrick (I10355)
|
| 4074 | This person is a twin. "He married. April 20, 1676, Emma Fairchild, of Stratfield. They settled at Woodbury, Connecticut. Children, born there William, March 21, 1676-77, ...Hannah, baptized August, 1680; Lydia, baptized November, 1682;, baptized November, 1683; Jehiel, baptized October, 1686; Emma, March, 1688; Remember, baptized October, 1691." (quote from Sharon Metcalf) | PRESTON, Haikaliah (I16219)
|
| 4075 | This person is a twin. He also became a Deacon. (C-840) | PRESTON, Eliasaph (I12225)
|
| 4076 | This record from 1854 | Source (S3155)
|
| 4077 | This record might apply to Robin. If so, he is deceased as it is a Social Security Death Index record: "Robin Q. Barr SSN: 364-44-2715 Last Residence: 33021 Hollywood, Broward, Florida, United States of America Born: 11 Jul 1945 Died: 28001 State (Year) SSN issued: Michigan (1960-1961 )." Instead he might be the brother of Virginia who was listed as Robert in the 1940 census, age 1. | BARR, Robin (I2146)
|
| 4078 | This Robert might be the one who married Jane Jerment on Dec. 26, 1667 in South Petherton. The marriage might apply to Robert, son of John, b.in 1647 instead. (F-472) | FORTE, Robert (I659)
|
| 4079 | This Robert might possibly be the Robert Wilson who left a will on May 13, 1821 in Guilford Co., North Carolina. If so, his wife's name was Sarah and he had two children, David and Nancy. There was also another Robert Wilson in this samey who made his will on Dec. 4, 1833. He apparently had no spouse or children as only his brother Benjamin and nephews and nieces by the name of Green were mentioned. (C-952) In 1797 in Guilford, a Robert Wilson sold land to a Benjamin Wilson. This is likely the father of Benjamin and Robert, therefore, precludes these records from being a match. (C-953) | WILLSON, Robert Jr. (I259)
|
| 4080 | This Robert was entitled Robert the Strong, Duke of Nuestria in Tompsett's Royal Homepage. (C-1351) He was listed as Robert the Strong, Count of Wormgau, Paris, Anjou, and Blois in Weis's, "Ancestral Roots". Adelaide was his second wife1440) | COUNT OF PARIS, Robert "Le Fort" (I13291)
|
| 4081 | This Samuel and his wife Mary had two known children, Elizabeth who married Edward Chaote, Jr. and Samuel (b. after 1725). His birth year is from an I.G.I file for North America. (C-437) | UNDERWOOD, Samuel (I12296)
|
| 4082 | This Samuel Coppock who married Lavina Coate was the son of Moses William and Martha Lester Coppock according to Charles P. Dye (b. 1855) who submitted his Coate Coppock lineage early in the 20th century to support the Coate Coppock land leourt case. Mendenhall in his book claims that Samuel is the son of Joseph and Jane Coppock. Since Samuel is listed in his father, Joseph Coppock's will, I have connected him into this family, though there could be a Samuel in each family of similar peerage confusing the issue. (C-390L, E) | COPPOCK, Samuel (I13602)
|
| 4083 | This Samuel Kelly might be the one who ran a wood cording and cotton manufacturing business in Union Twp., Miami Co., Ohio. If so, he and his family were from Massachusetts according to Motes 1880 recollections. (C-2251c) | KELLY, Samuel (I14550)
|
| 4084 | This Sarah CLARK can be confused with a Sarah who was christened on 7 Apr 1644 in Milford, New Haven Co, CT; [AF shows dob 18 February 1642/43]. She married (1) on 27 Nov 1663 to Reinold MARVIN m. (2) on 1 Jun 1664 to Jonathan LAW m: (32 Feb 1677 to Capt. Joseph SILL. She is listed as the daughter of Deacon Georg CLARK and Sarah in CD 100. (CL-326) She is listed as being born in 1643 in Arundel-Ross's letter, but this would be much to late for her marriage in 1650. One of these dates has to be wrong. (c-1516) | CLARK, Sarah (I15463)
|
| 4085 | This Short is listed as Adam Short in a history of Delaware (Co., PA). However, Lauren Varga has hired a genealogist to search primary documents in England. She has found the three children of Miriam Ingram to be with husband Henry Shortt Adam Short) as herein listed via written baptismal records in Ford, Sussex, ENG. (C-1576, 1583, 1584, 1585) If Henry's baptism occurred when he was a baby, he was married at a very young age of fifteen or so. The baptism record states that Henry, son of Henry by his wife Elizabeth was baptized May 9, 1647, and it seems to fit this Henry well except it makes him younger than we would have expected. (C-1592) | SHORT, Henry (I15814)
|
| 4086 | This Short line is likely to go back to a William Short who left a will in 1538 in Walberton, Sussex, ENG. The will is currently be translated by a professional researcher (7/98) as it's in old English. (C-1576) It is possible that thn was married once before he married Joan. This is because of an unexplained baptism of a Thomas Short, son of John Short on Oct. 26, 1606. (C-1592) This could also indicate that his first and seconds sons, John and Thomas had a different mother than Joan Beeding. A partial transcription of the will of John Short is as follows: "May 27 1638, 14th year of reign of Lord King Charles, John Short the elder, husbandman, of the parish of Walberton, County of Sussex, I give and bequeath to my eldest son John Short five pounds of lawful money of England to be paid him within a year after my death. Item. Give and bequeath to two grandchildren John and Harry the sons of the said John Short... Item, I give and bequeath to my second son Thomas Short the sum of Twenty pounds of god and lawfull monoy of England to be payd him within halfe a year after my decease Item, to Agnes my daughter in law the wife of the sayd Thomas forty shillings to be paid his wife a half a year after my decease Item I give and bequeath to the Sayd Agnes (ealfo) a dozen (po ) to be delivered her within a month after my decease ...Item, I give and bequeath to my godchildren (......................) payd Thomas (Renit) (if) demanded) Item, I give and bequeth five shillings of lawfull Inglish monoy to the poor of Walberton to be payd them the day of my buryall; Item, I give & bequeath to the (parrish Church) of Walberton (....... ........) to be payd the (....... .... .... ..... .. ... after my death) Item; I give and bequeath to my wife Joane Short and my son Henry Short all the residu... (Joane and Henry are executors.) | SHORT, John (I14589)
|
| 4087 | This son currently suggested by the Time Tree on FTDNA descends down through John P. Calhoun, 1685-1755 of co. Tyrone, Ireland via the following breadcrumbs: BY5775 > FT32806 > FT32022 > FTA41789. | COLQUHOUN, FT32806 (I18605)
|
| 4088 | This son of Norman and Theresia is remembered by older brother, Hank, as a baby who died at birth. (F-39) | FORTE, Son (I371)
|
| 4089 | This surname was originally spelled Irvine. It's also commonly spelled Ervine, Erwin and Irwin. Edwards' wife was Mary Curry, grand-daughter of Dr. Robert Curry. His mother was Mary Curry, d. of Dr. Robert Curry and according to the "y of Pocahontas, West Virginia" by Price his grandmother was Mary Curry, sister to Dr. Robert Curry. I have not personally seen any evidence of this last statement as there is no known sister of Dr. Robert named Mary unless it was an unknown sister-in-law. (CL-490) | ERWIN, Edward (I8268)
|
| 4090 | This Thomas and family never came to America. E.E. Cornwall passes along a tradition that William had two brothers who accompanied him to America. Others have assumed it was this Thomas as there is a Thomas in Long Island and Rhode Islat have created this mismatch. (F-593) | CORNWELL, Thomas (I12498)
|
| 4091 | This Thomas appears to have been the first named Thomas in this family. It is my conjecture that he died before the second of three Thomas's listed in the Ancestral file. (C-600) | STOCKETT, Thomas (I365)
|
| 4092 | This Thomas could be the son of widow Elizabeth Mellows of St. Olaves, Southwark, Surry. Her will dated Jan. 15, 1682/83 names Thomas Wells, "my son who went into parts beyound the seas to Maryland or other parts in America or elsewheree shall come and arrive in England." Her daughter Mary Parker (wife of John Parker) was executor. (C-575) Thomas Wells was transported by Robert Conant of Anne Arundel Co., MD. sometime before 20 Apr. 1679 to the province of Maryland. For this deed, Robert Conant was owed 50 acres of land which Thomas agreed to inhabit for 16 years. These rights were afterwords assigned to Nocholas Laintes of St. Mary's City. Thomas was one of several that agreed to these same terms for their passage. On Jan. 26, 1696, Thomas Wells, planter, purchased 200 acres called "Strife" in Calvert Co., MD. on the west side of the Patuxent River. The land was surrounded by the following owners: Francis Swantstone, Edward Isaak, and Henry Darnell, Esq. He later acquired an adjoining property called "Something" that was in the Patuxent Hundred of Prince George's Co. He is in the Prince George Co. records often. In July 1696, he was found guilty of assaulting Thomas Swareingen. He was sentenced to pay a fine and post a bond to guarantee good behavior. In Nov. 1697, "he was paid a bounty for one wolves head." He was a Grand Jury member. He was subpoenaed in March 1698 to testify that Elizabeth Plummer (mother of Margaret Swanson) sent a servant to steal onions, cabbage and bacon from him. On March 28, 1698 he became drunk and was caught fighting, again noted in the courts. By Sep. 29, 1699, all was forgiven as he was again served on a jury. In Sep. 29, 1699, he and Thomas Pelle were appointed overseer of the Patuxent Hundred. In Queen Anne's Vestry minutes of April 7, 1707, Thomas Wells, Sr. was appointed vestryman. In 1714 he witnessed the boundary lines of an adjoining tract of land where the records state "Thomas Wells, Senr. aged about sixty one years." (Maryland, Chancery Record, Liber 3, folio 27) In his will probated Jan. 5, 1718/19, he gives his land for life to his wife, France. He then divided it amongst 4 sons; Thomas, Nathan, Robert, and Joseph. He gave slaves to his four daughters. Lastly he gave his eldest son George five shillings. (C-575) The low amount of money he gave to his son George could be explained by his son's cohabiting with his married neighbor, Susannah Swanson Ward according to Queen Anne's Vestry Minutes, Apr. 12, 1719. George and Susannah were married at several years later according to Queen Annes Vestry minutes on June 16, 1725. (C-575, p. 52) DNA evidence is supporting the lineage of descent that I come from as being from this Thomas Wells to his son Joseph as listed in the will and as I have stated in this genealogy. | WELLS, Thomas Duckett (I12934)
|
| 4093 | This Thomas could be the Thomas Leigh who was the son of Agnes Leigh and Richard de Lymm who had a son Thomas that assumed the surname of Leigh from his mother. He was the ancestor of the Leigh's of West Hall. Agnes's father was Richardgh of High Leigh. Richard's great-grandfather was Hamon de Leigh, Lord of the Moiety of Co. Chester who lived during the time of Henry II (sometime from 1154-1189). (F-399) | LEIGH, Thomas (I16305)
|
| 4094 | This Thomas had parents named John and Mary Coate. It's his grandfather that is in question as it is only theory that he is that he is the son of the John Coate who was the son of Thomas Coate. | COATES, Thomas (I6680)
|
| 4095 | This Thomas is likely to be the Thomas who was baptized at the Welsh Tract Baptist Church in New Castle, Delaware. (C-635) He might also be the Thomas Underwood who witnessed the will of Charles Calvert in what was then St. Mary's Co.ow is Prince George Co., MD in 1711 or the Thomas Underwood who's will was witnessed by Wilson Coates in 1734 in Bath Co. (now Beufort Co.), North Carolina. (C-2158) | UNDERWOOD, Thomas (I234)
|
| 4096 | This Thomas is possibly the son of John Coate as placed here and if not son, is still highly likely to be related to him. He was born about 10 years before John married Esther Doughty, but the connection between them is suggested on Jan.743 when John and Esther Coate deeded 20 acres to Thomas Coate, Weaver of the tract he previously purchased from John's father-in-law. He sold this land ten years later to Nathaniel Leforge close to the time when he married and purchased land in Amwell Twp., Hunterdon Co, NJ from Joseph King (his possible father-in-law). (Park) The other good theory as to his parentage is that he is the son of the Thomas Coate, weaver, of Salem Co., N.J. who died in 1733. (Park) Thomas was alive in 1778 and 1780 when he witnessed his daughter, Hannah and Amey's marriages. He was dead by Apr. 10, 1788 when his wife is listed as a widow in a certificate of transfer to the Buckingham M.M. in Bucks Co., Pennsylvania. | COATES, Thomas (I14721)
|
| 4097 | This Thomas is possibly the Thomas Coate in the 1850 census for Union Twp., Miami Co., Ohio He might be the Thomas who was a Private in the Civil War in the USCT INF., Co., K, Regiment 62. If so, he died on Feb 7, 1865. I suspect its to a younger Thomas than this one though. (C-1528) | COATE, Thomas (I14215)
|
| 4098 | This Thomas is possibly the Thomas Stockett who sold 219 acres of his land called "Obligation" to Samuel Galloway in Anne Arundel Co., MD sometime before 1719. (C-603) Thomas and his first wife had two children. Thomas and his secon, Damaris, had fourteen children. (F-597) | STOCKETT, Thomas (I5838)
|
| 4099 | This Thomas is probably the Thomas Brinton who was christened along with his twin sister, Margery Brinton, in 1676/7 at Sedgley, England. Their parents were not listed in these early records, and no first hand proof exists of who they were "Brinton Genealogy" states they were Thomas and Ellen Brinton, two people who do exist in the area records. The "Brinton Genealogy" also gives a May 31, 1562 birth date for our Thomas, but this really is too early for his actual marriage date and was reported off by a day from a Thomas Brinton in the records born on May 30, 1562. Thomas is listed as a laborer at the baptism's of his children. (C-1364) | BRINTON, Thomas Jr. (I12322)
|
| 4100 | This Thomas may be the Thomas de Astley, 3rd Lord of Astley who married Elizabeth, dau. of the 2nd Lord Warwick. If so, he was the grandson of Sir Andrew de Astley who gained the family title of "Lord of Astley" by writ of summons dated 2, 1295. He married an Elizabeth and had multiple children, his second son being Sir Thomas de Astley who also married an Elizabeth. (F-399) Andrew Astley's lineage is on CD-100 and printed out in F-437 if this lineage proves to be Thomas's. | ASTLEY, Thomas (I12768)
|
We make every effort to document our research. If you have something you would like to add, please contact us. Thank you to all whom have contributed in the past.
