Notes |
- I'm assuming that I have him connected to the correct, John the tanner, as his father and had probably died by 1665 when his father wrote his will. This John could possibly be the father to our Aaron Coppock by time and place. However, if we take Holland's 1838 letter into account, it's John the Tanner who is the father of our Aaron instead. Margaret Holland's letter states: "The Coppocks of Mobberley & Tarvin, There appears to have been two distinct branches of the Northenden family living at Mobberley. One branch, probably cousins of John & Margaret Dean in 1634, and they had several children baptized at Mobberley, including Bryan, the eldest, 1645 (probably called after a kinsman of Etchells), Jonathan, Mary, Aaron, & Elizabeth. " Here is how I interpret this part of her letter: One branch of the Northenden Coppock family living at Mobberley were probably cousins to John and Margaret Dean who married in 1634. John and Margaret Dean had several children baptized at Mobberley, including Bryan, the eldest, 1645 (probably named after the relative named Bryan who was a kinsman of the Etchells), Jonathan, Mary, Aaron and Elizabeth. It matches it's entirety John the Tanner and Margaret Dean's family with the family of John the Tanner and Margaret Dean. Furthermore, her letter stated: "John Coppock of Mobberley, Tanner, was buried there in 1666, and his will is at Chester. His father was named John. Bryan Coppock, his heir (who was baptized in 1645) probably found an impoverished business, & went to live near Tarvin. He died there in 1722, and was buried in Mobberley. He had issue Joseph, who may have been the same as that mentioned in the Register as of "Maud's House"-- very likely the present "Mode Cottage"-- about 1800, and the names of several children appear on the register...
|